Educational Technology Leadership Role Simulation

The leadership role simulation centered around addressing challenges related to Highland Grove High School implementing its 1:1 device program. Each participant demonstrated a unique leadership style while offering solutions to tackle teacher pushback from 40% of the educators, insufficient professional development opportunities, student internet connectivity problems, and technical support budget limitations.

​

Leadership Approaches: 

• Transformational Leader (Angela Speck): The transformative leader planned to engage teachers by offering a visionary outlook together with a tech resource center and Google Classroom instruction while keeping parents informed through a monthly newsletter. The plan includes the establishment of peer mentoring programs as well as the demonstration of effective model implementations.

• Adaptive Leader (Leslie Gutierrez): The leader underscored adaptive problem-solving while making use of expert teachers' insights. Experienced teachers should join up with hesitant veteran educators in support pods to help them adapt.

• Authoritative Leader (Kelsie Adams): Recommended a hierarchical approach that includes explicit expectations along with required training and designated team leaders. Recommended department-by-department implementation alongside rewards for teachers who adopt the program first.

• Collaborative Leader (Ann Zastryzny): Stressed open communication, shared decision-making, and relationship-building. The leader recommended conducting teacher surveys to collect feedback along with offering Saturday training sessions that provide incentives and establishing department leads to manage the implementation process.

• Servant Leader (Ayla Rightenour): Prioritized trust, teacher empowerment, and community building. The approach included student tech support teams working alongside peer mentors and regular feedback sessions to measure implementation progress. Advocated for parental involvement and communication. 

• General Observations: Common solutions such as peer mentoring and student tech helpers along with parental newsletters and internet access support (hotspots and community Wi-Fi) were implemented across different leadership styles which also offered flexible professional development opportunities.
  ​

Challenges and Considerations: 

• Teacher resistance due to fear of change. 

• Concerns over internet access for students. 

• Budget constraints for technical support. 

• The management of workload for essential support personnel requires careful attention (such as librarians).

• Ensuring student responsibility for devices. 
   

Key Takeaways from the Discussion: 

• An effective rollout requires leaders to blend various leadership styles.

• Collaboration and clear communication are essential. 

• Positive reinforcement alongside incentives proves effective in breaking down resistance.

• Successfully addressing challenges requires both flexibility and adaptability.
   

My Views on the Discussion 

My perspective as a servant leader recognized this discussion as valuable because it highlighted how different leadership styles must work together to accomplish shared objectives. Here are my key reflections: 
 

• Trust and Empowerment Are Essential: Teachers who exhibit uncertainty towards new initiatives should receive support and acknowledgment to feel valued. The creation of a learning environment where knowledge flows freely between all participants can be achieved by implementing mentorship programs and assigning tech-savvy student assistants.

• Parental Involvement Matters: During our discussion, I pointed out that parental resistance toward the 1:1 initiative stems from worries about responsibility and internet safety. Open communication channels alongside newsletters and direct responses to issues successfully create family support for new initiatives.

• A Balanced Leadership Approach Works Best: Multiple leadership styles are necessary because no single approach proves effective by itself. Authoritative leadership creates organized systems and mandatory compliance yet collaborative and transformational leadership produces flexible outcomes and stakeholder support. As a servant leader I focus on developing relationships through active listening and ongoing support delivery.

• Technology Management Needs Realistic Expectations: I believe Chromebook carts should stay in classrooms because taking devices home leads to more management issues. The potential problems of damage and loss alongside responsibility matters surpass the advantages for most scenarios. Effective integration of technology into school settings leads to superior management and maintenance of devices.

• Continuous Feedback Drives Success: My commitment to serving stakeholders drives my support for survey implementation along with mentorship programs and open communication channels. Open feedback loops enable us to monitor progress and modify the implementation plan as needed.
   

Final Thoughts

The discussion showed how different leadership styles combine to solve complex problems. While servant leadership remains my natural preference I still recognize the need to integrate authoritative, transformational, and adaptive aspects within our implementation strategy to achieve greater balance and effectiveness.